![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Nov 2006 05:34:37 -0800, "Steve - KDMW"
wrote: Question... I have to do a lot of regional travel for my company and, due to the work we do, most of my work is actually at airports. I've asked my company if I can use my personal aircraft for a lot of this travel and they denied my request due to what the company percieves as their liability in the matter. Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the I worked for a large multi national chemical corporation. We had Two jets and a turboprop. When it came to flying on a business for themselves even the pilots were not allowed to serve as crew in any capacity. difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? Company lawyers and insurance companies is the difference. Plus airplanes are a much higher profile than cars. We accept multi-car pileups as just the cost of doing business. The public would be and usually is, up in arms when a small plane hits the free way if there is an altercation between the plane and someone's car. Steve CP - ASEL/IA PA28-151 N43291 Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
From the Jim Campbell, Captain Zoom archives (all of 6 years ago) | Mick | Home Built | 49 | February 3rd 06 03:27 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 0 | March 31st 05 04:29 AM |