Recent Political Change May Positively Affect GA

BTW, another year or two of flight restrictions, closed
airports and background checks on every pilot, citizen or
not. And airplanes WON'T have been used in any way in these
attacks.




"Jim Macklin" wrote
in message ...
| With the change in Congress from "we will win" to "Yes,
| Osama, we will cut and run" I expect an attack on NYC and
DC
| between Jan 4-20, 2007 and an attack in SoCal by March 19
| that will force evacuation of much of SoCal [it will just
be
| a few satchels of high explosive on the right/wrong
places].
| All non-essential people and services will be ordered to
| move. Food production and manufacturing will be stopped.
| Only military and dock workers will be allowed to stay.
| Recovery will take a year or more.
|
| Boy, I really feel good about the election and the stupid
| people who slept all the way through history class.
|
|
|
| "Larry Dighera" wrote in message
| ...
|| On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 22:22:48 +0100, Greg Farris
|
|| wrote in :
||
|| Politics in flying (like politics in many, many
things)is
| about personal
|| interest, and not ideological or financial issues.
||
|| That view overlooks the fact that the Bush administration
| is VERY pro
|| privatization of government functions. They've
eliminated
| KP for the
|| troops. Private contractors make the meals, and they
| interrogate the
|| prisoners of war. Unlike US military personnel, they are
| not governed
|| by the Military Code of Justice.
||
|| The best political
|| protection for GA is to have the greatest number of
| pilots in elected
|| office. They're about equally mixed between Republicans
| and Democrats -
|| If you want to go "single issue" on GA, vote for the guy
| with the plane!
||
|| Bush is a pilot, but he doesn't seem to have any regard
| for his fellow
|| pilots' interests. Kerry seems to be more of a GOP
secret
| weapon than
|| a pro aviation influence. :-)
||
|
|