![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's take the silly ones first:
No freedoms are silly when they are taken away. 1. I recently flew over Washington, DC. It was bone-simple. Did you really? I just got off the phone with the Leesburg FSS to check my info. They tell me that ABSOLUTELY NO VFR flight is permitted in the FRZ, except for based aircraft whose pilots have undergone a background check, received a PIN number for that flight, received permission for conducting that flight, and have previously visited the airport (there's one in particular, but I didn't ask) IN PERSON to make application, which means driving in the first time. This is not "bone simple". IFR flight is not permitted either, unless one is going into National, and in that case you must land outside the ADIZ and pick up an armed flight marshall who will fly aboard your aircraft while you fly into the FRZ. I remember you made a big deal out of going to Dulles, for a special event where the way was paved for you. But that's not the same as flying over the Nation's Capital. Washington DC is =inside= the FRZ. So, tell me. What exactly =did= you do? 2. With only a few airworthy space shuttles left -- and a political climate that makes replacing them impossible -- I see nothing wrong with restricting the airspace around Cape Canaveral. Why? Perhaps a little one mile ring to keep people who can't maneuver an airplane with that degree of precision away, but if you think this keeps intentional harm away from the complex, that is laughable. 3. I'm sure I can buy wine anywhere. So what? The freedom to carry =my= wine in =my= carry-on is not a silly freedom. Besides, many of the wines one can get in California are not available anywhere else. There just isn't enough made. I don't want the government telling me what wine I can drink, which is what effectively happens. I guess you wouldn't understand though. You drink beer. ![]() The wine rule came about because wine is a liquid, and somebody tried to use liquid explosive. Ever played with powdered sugar around a heat source? 4. Letting people carry weapons on an airliner has proven to be a "bad thing." I believe this restriction is in the "common sense" category. People carrying weapons is not a Bad Thing. It is only when Bad people carry weapons where Good people can't that it's a Bad Thing. And a Swiss Army Knife is not a weapon, except in the sense that anything can be used as one (including a pencil). The PA airliner didn't make it to the White House because Good People fought the terrorists back. The solution is to keep weapons away from Good People. Hmmm. Common sense? Now on to the meatier examples: 1. The library rule will be overturned. Luckily, it's so unworkable, in practice, that it is not used. Really? You must get more use out of your time machine than you do out of the Pathfinder. I don't see any reason for the government to overturn the library rule, and it's the government that made it. All they have to do is keep quiet about it. As it is, most people aren't aware of it, and many that are are of the opinion that "if you aren't reading anything bad, you have nothing to worry about." How do you know that the library rule is not used? Part of the rule is that the librarians are NOT ALLOWED TO SAY when it's been used. 2. I hadn't heard that US citizens could have their homes searched without due process. Are you referring to wire tapping overseas phone calls? Anybody can have their homes searched without due process if the feds use the magic words "national security". I'm also referring to aspects of "home" that are not geographical, such as the contents of your hard drive (which may be seized and searched if you try to bring a laptop on an airliner), the expanded wiretapping and internet tapping surveillance, and other tramplings of what we once considered private. These measures are being pushed through without much resistance, in the name of National Security. Each one passed makes it easier to pass the next one. 3. I hadn't head that US citizens could be held without charges being brought. If the charges are based on National Security, the government could deem them too secret to present to you. I have no first-hand experience with this, but I am no longer convinced that we are not all vulnerable to it. We're going to win the war on terrorism just like we won the war on drugs. Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Piloting | 533 | June 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror | PirateJohn | Military Aviation | 1 | September 6th 03 10:05 AM |