![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
----------
In article , Ricardo wrote: Check on their recent submarine acquisitions, diesel and nuclear. Uh huh. How many? Two? Three? http://www.heritage.org/Research/Asi...fic/wm1001.cfm http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...3134-8152r.htm Have a look - and think about it! Well, The Heritage Foundation says the answer is--four. And also accuses the US Navy of ignoring the threat. That's kinda funny, actually, because the submarine service would be jumping all over this if it's true. I have a glossy brochure that they produced over a decade ago warning about all the submarines that the Russians were launching, and that didn't happen. Something that frequently gets lost in the hype about Chinese "force modernization" is that in many cases they are not really increasing their numbers. They're simply replacing badly outdated equipment. Their sub fleet is ancient, so they're modernizing it. Don't believe all the hype. Yeah, they're building weapons, but it's not at a great rate. D |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue | Mike | Naval Aviation | 26 | July 11th 06 11:38 PM |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
F-105 and A-4 loss rates over North Vietnam | KDR | Naval Aviation | 14 | April 22nd 06 10:38 PM |
C-130 on Navy Carrier | W. D. Allen Sr. | Naval Aviation | 101 | February 21st 05 04:40 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |