![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert writes:
And the studies that prove that statement can be found where? Innumerable automation projects have made this pretty obvious over the past half-century or so. Today it is generally not considered something that must be proved, at least by people who design these systems. And how would you explain away the FAA-certified FBW aircraft that have been flying so succesfully and accident free for decades? You don't need certification to fly safely. Conversely, certification is not a guarantee that your flight is safe. The domain of fly-by-wire is still much more poorly understood than more traditional systems ... so much so that certification and testing are still much more trial and error than they are for older systems. Thus, certification is far less useful for fly-by-wire systems; they can still fail very catastrophically indeed. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a Complex Plane? | [email protected] | Piloting | 12 | December 7th 05 03:19 AM |
Commercial rating: complex aircraft required aircraft for practical test? | Marc J. Zeitlin | Piloting | 22 | November 24th 05 04:11 AM |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
Experience transitioning from C-172 to complex aircraft as potential first owned aircraft? | Jack Allison | Owning | 12 | June 14th 04 08:01 PM |
Complex Aircraft Question | Chris | General Aviation | 5 | October 18th 03 04:40 AM |