A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LSA Class?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old November 29th 06, 02:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default LSA Class?


Larry wrote:
Why is the FAA so supportive of this class of flying? Older pilots?
passenger allowed? more skill required in bad weather? less reliable
powerplants? no FAA medical exam? Less stringent certification of LSA?
I can only surmise that the FAA, EAA and MAYBE a need for grooming
future military pilots (where ever they go) endorse this effort. I am
only concerned about safety and why we even consider this class of
flying. Freedom yes but the FAA/EAA says "become a pilot faster,
easier, and cheaper than ever before". This scares me and I worry about
safety. Maybe I am wrong in my thinking.


These are valid concerns, but I think they are misplaced. You are
quite correct that the just-certified Sport Pilot (SP) will have had
less total training than the just-certified Private Pilot (PP).
However, much of that training will cover operations that are
prohibited to the SP. In fact, although having had somewhat fewer
hours of training, the SP may have in fact had *more* training in those
areas directly affecting his flights (Day, VFR).

As for the (LSA) aircraft, there is no reason to assume that they are
any less safe. It is certainly true that they are not required to be
equipped for night flight or for flight in instrument conditions
(flying inside the clouds) - but those operations are prohibited to the
LSA SP anyway.

My normally certificated aircraft is not certified for flight in known
icing; whereas the MD-80 that I am about to board is so certified. Is
my plane inherently less safe? Not if I stay out of the ice!

In fact, the truth of the matter is that the FAA supported the LSA
rules precisely to *improve* safety. The reality of ultra-lights in
the US is that probably 80% of them are technically illegal
(overweight, above max fuel, more than one seat, etc.). They fly with
a reasonable level of safety, but they were pretty much without FAA
oversight. One of the goals of LSA was to bring more of these "into
the system" and give the FAA back some control.

Will some SP in an LSA eventually do something really stupid and kill
himself and maybe a passenger? Of course. And, unfortunate though it
is, tonight some guy will down a couple of six packs and manage to kill
himself and maybe a bunch of others on the highway. In both cases it
was the stupidity that was unsafe, not the level of training or the
mechanical condition of the vehicle.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SPORTS CLASS/CLUB CLASS 5 ugly Soaring 0 July 2nd 06 11:14 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Carrying flight gear on the airlines Peter MacPherson Piloting 20 November 25th 04 12:29 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.