![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"PilotWeb.org" wrote: If ATC uses the term "Cleared for approach" and/or gave you a clearance limit, using the term "Cleared" then yes, you were operating under IFR. Well, that's the question, isn't it? Are you talking about the US here? I've spent entire afternoons doing practice approaches with NorCal Approach here on the US's left coast and been "cleared for [approach]" every time. They'll occasionally throw in a "maintain VFR" in the same phrase, but that's not even common on the approaches I typically practice on. The actual term IFR isn't usually used on the radio much, (they rarely say anything like "Cleared IFR...") I can't imagine they *ever* say that, but never mind... [...] [advertising deleted...] Hamish |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Getting the MOCA | Dan | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | July 3rd 06 01:43 AM |
IFR use of handheld GPS | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 251 | May 19th 06 02:04 PM |
More IFR with VFR GPS questions | Chris Quaintance | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | November 30th 05 08:39 PM |