![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Mxsmanic posted:
Mark Levin writes: As was pointed out to me the Beechcraft Baron does not use contra-rotating propellers. A bit of research showed me that most U.S. built light twins do not use them either. My question is why? My guess is that the market for mirror-image engines (the most straightforward implementation) is too small. If you don't use mirror images, you have asymmetries in the powerplant engineering. Probably not the market, but the cost of maintenance, quantity of available parts, and other things mentioned in this thread are reason enough to warrant the practice. I do wish that things were different. I consider the effects of P-factor and torque to be design defects. A design defect is a problem caused by some aspect of the design. I don't know why you would consider the effects of propeller propulsion to be "design defects". They are simply aspects of that type of propulsion. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | RomeoMike | Piloting | 6 | December 2nd 06 01:47 AM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Newps | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 07:40 PM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Greg Farris | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 07:25 PM |
HOW MANY GLIDER PILOTS DOES IT TAKE TO CHANGE A LIGHT BULB | Mal | Soaring | 59 | October 4th 05 05:39 AM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |