![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mike regish" wrote in message
... Part of the problem with the car analogy is that in a plane we are flying through an unseen medium. Some people, I think can have a hard time viscerally comprehending that. You cna see a road and any bumps in it. Some can "see" the air pretty well and know what to expect, but some never really develope that sense. I don't think so. Most drivers aren't paying any attention to the road over which they travel, and the basics of operating an airplane are easy enough to master without considering at all the physical nature of the air through which one flies. I agree that this perception makes a difference in how good a pilot (or driver) is. But it's not necessary, and many people in both activities never develop that perception (though probably this failure occurs more often for drivers than pilots). The car analogy works just fine...a person who can be taught to drive can be taught to fly an airplane. It might not be possible to make them a pilot, but they clearly have the motor skills required for the basic control of an airplane. I learned in a hang glider, and I think that helped me a lot with my PPL since I was much more intimately aware of what the wind does. It really needs to become instinctive. If you could teach some of these "unteachables" in perfectly calm winds all the time, anybody who can handle a car should be able to handle a plane. Just teach to the numbers. Throw in some wind, which is almost always (if not always) present, and their reactions aren't there. But just as not being in "perfectly calm winds" causes problems for some would-be pilots, so too will not being on "perfectly smooth roads" cause problems for some would-be drivers. It really is the same issue, the main difference being that the standard of qualification is lower for drivers, and so we actually have "certificated drivers" who are not capable of safely dealing with any road condition significantly different from clear and dry. Just ask the millions of drivers here in the Seattle area who earlier this week clogged our roads with vehicles improperly equipped for the snow conditions, driven by drivers unqualified to operate in those conditions. Most should get it at some point, but there may be a few who never will. Agreed. But it usually has nothing to do with basic motor skills. There are lots of people who are permitted to drive a motor vehicle who still aren't suited for being a pilot. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |