![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the explanation(s); had forgotten about there being the W-1,
W-2, etc. Am I to understand that an ALDO can not go above LT? Can any LDO, regardless the specility, go above LT? fudog50 wrote: Mike, Trying to be as respectful and tactful as I can, hopefully this answers those 2 questions: 1.) I was permanantly commissioned the day I swore the oath, as are the rest of my CWO brothers and sisters. LDO's are not permanant commissioned until after thier second year as a LT, (6 years commissioned). They are asked at that point if they want to go permanant, if not they revert back to enlisted or can go home. By the way CWO's can NOT revert back because of the fact they are permanantly commissioned from day 1. *that "non-commissioned" comment smells like Army, ![]() 2.) I got the payscale sitting right here. Next year ( July 07) as a CWO4 I make 6220 base pay, after 8 years commissioned. A LT LDO (same 8 years commissioned) tops out at 5715. 0-4's make 6250, so they make 30 bucks more, wow. However, a CWO5 after 12 years commissioned makes 6850. So they lose money by making ACWO's vice ALDO's. Look at 2007 payscale and see for yourself. Compare CWO2 to O1E with over 8 its the same advantage for CWO. Also CWO3 to 02E, CWO's simply make more money with the same amount of years commissioned, with one exception. It takes only 2 years for an ENS to make JG and 3 years from CWO2 to CWO3, so for that 1 year period, the LDO makes more. After that its all over except the crying! Its simply a bad idea, no one yet has convinced any of my fellow LDO/CWO's otherwise. Sure there are some good points, but again the bad far outweighs them! Anyway they should start these guys out as W-1's like Army,(simply a warrant officer, NOT a Chief Warrant Officer. That would fix a lot of the whole problems. For example, not to many sane persons would go from Chief to W-1. Thats why the Navy has no W-1. You go from Cheif to CWO2. This new program allows a dozen or so E-5 or E-6 straight to CWO2!!! On 6 Dec 2006 12:39:24 -0800, "Mike Weeks" wrote: fudog50 wrote: Sorry I forgot on my last winded reply: The Navy already had a prgram like this in the past it was called, ALDO, (Aviator Limited Duty Officer) God only knows why the higher ups didn't just resurrect this program! You would be drawing from the same pool of highly motivated, smart people and wouldn't have to completly bypass the entire CWO career path the rest of us have gone through and will continue to do. Could it be due to the ALDO being commissioned, and the CWO is not? Don't have to pay as much for example? It's almost as if they brought back the NAPs (flying Chief's), just give them the CWO rate instead as well as limited type flying-only duty. Again, just a question. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPORTS CLASS/CLUB CLASS | 5 ugly | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 06 11:14 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |