![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Incorrect.
You're missing a force in there. Picture this: Lay a tire on it's side on a frozen lake (close enough to frictionless for this example). Now wrap a rope around it a couple of times (like you would to start an old outboard motor on a boat). Now quickly pull on the rope at a tangent to the tread. You'll see two things happen. 1) the tire will rotate (Ok, that's pretty obvious) but also 2) The center of the tire will move in the same direction that you are pulling on the rope. The reason that the center will be displaced from it's original location is the same reason that the plane WILL move. Your statement would be valid only under one condition.........If the wheel, itself, had no mass. Hmmmm.. gotta think about that one. Not suggesting that you're incorrect but just wondering how the hub could act on the spindle if the bearing were truly *frictionless*?! Something has to push on something at some level. At what point are frictional forces described/replaced by more fundamental interactions? (maybe I need to consult the great oracle, wiki, to get the true definition of friction ;-)) On 2nd thought it would seem that the spindle WOULD be *pushed* backwards by photon pressure. (Holy crap! ... I didn't want to let THAT dead/alive cat out of the box.!) :-( Also, by definition, the treadmill/conveyor will NOT MOVE AT ALL unless the airplane/wheel hub IS moving in the opposite direction. We're back again to the point of the riddle which I believe is to suggest that the airplane would take off regardless of what the wheels or conveyor are doing. (This is starting to sound more & more like the chicken and the egg.) For Jose's question above, I think that by *frictionless* most people are thinking of the hub & bearings and not where the rubber meets the conveyor. If the wheel/conveyor interface were frictionless then neither the wheels nor the conveyor would turn unless the problem can be interpreted as the conveyor matching the hub's linear speed rather than the wheel's angular speed. Either way the plane takes off when it reaches sufficient airspeed. Tony P. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |