![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message
.. . boB: BTW squared, In the process of doing the PRA magazine we met and spent some time with Comander Ken Wallis who is the UK gyro king. He did all of the flying for the James Bond movie that had the "Little Nellie" gyro. He doesn't share the statements that both horizontal stabilizers and center line thrust are a must. At least in his experience, and I might add mine (both my wife and I self taught in a Benson back in the late 60s and never dinged the ship and flew in a variety of conditions). This is not to say that some ships with an abundance of body work forward of the mast can't benefit from both things tho. I think that the two seat side-by-side gyros like the RAF and Sparrohawk would certainly fly different in gusty winds than the skimpy single seat Benson that I used to fly. -- Stuart Fields Experimental Helo magazine P. O. Box 1585 Inyokern, CA 93527 (760) 377-4478 (760) 408-9747 general and layout cell (760) 608-1299 technical and advertising cell Not trying to start any arguments here, there's been too many of them on this subject through the years, but.... I believe you when you say that h-stabs and centerline thrust are not necessarily a must. I know that many folks have flown gyros without these features for years without incident. I also know that in my first 5 years as a PRA member, it seemed like every time I turned around I was reading about "another" member who had killed themselves in a high thrust line gyro and "many" of these folks were not low time beginners. They were well established members of the PRA who's opinions and experiences were very much respected. Not all of these incidents were directly related to the high thrust line issue but some of them were, at least many folks seemed to think so. In the past few years, there have been a number of people who have converted a high thrust line gyro to centerline thrust and/or added a horizontal stabilizer and in each case, there have been nothing but "glowing" reports on the improvements in the handling of the aircraft, especially in turbulent air. I've read hours upon hours of posts and information and waded through heated arguments and respectful conversations on the subject and I firmly believe that, while an experienced pilot can safely handle a high thrust line gyro, I think a beginner or relatively low time pilot will be infinitely better off in a centerline machine w/h-stab. I'm not a gyro pilot so maybe my opinion on this isn't worth squat but I know what I've seen and I know what I've read and I firmly believe that a pusher style gyro should have a h-stab and the engine thrust line should be as close to centerline thrust as possible. JMMOC, FWIW! Respectfully, Steve R. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Desktop Wallpaper - "F/A-18F Super Hornet Sunset". | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 1st 04 01:08 PM |
1st Aerobatic Flight -- I want a Super Decathalon! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 12 | August 20th 04 07:42 AM |
After 23 years, Marines get last Super Stallion CH-53E helicopter | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 25th 03 10:04 PM |
Murphy Super Rebel: Where are they? | Tim Hickey | Home Built | 1 | July 15th 03 08:36 PM |