![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris wrote:
There is no problem setting up a descent to bring you under cloud providing that whilst in cloud you remain 1000 feet above the highest obstacle within five miles either side of your track and once through the cloud are in VFR conditions. The above cannot be done in the US. We can descend to the MEA (which varies, ATC knows and will tell us), and if we are not in VFR conditions, then we have to do an intrument approach. MEA's are higher than 1000 AGL I can tell you that. MEA's are not published, but ATC has a map of them. Radar coverage madatory for IFR flight (with one exception, Class G). I don't honestly know what the rules are for descent in Class G with no radar and no IFR clearance. I don't think there are any. It doesn't happen much, almost all our IFR flight is with radar coverage and ATC clearances etc. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is 91.175 enforced in the USA? | Ron Rosenfeld | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | December 22nd 06 06:44 PM |
Is 91.175 enforced in the USA? | Jim Macklin | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | December 20th 06 12:19 PM |