![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote in message ps.com... Bela P. Havasreti wrote: Makes me want to bring up a comment made by an (forgotten to me by now, sorry) airshow performer who opined there is no reason to put an irreplaceable WW-II (or other) warbird at risk by performing maneuvers that have you "pulling for your life" in order to complete the manuever.... From an average airshow-goer's perspective, what's the difference between a low-level pull-up to a split-ess with a resulting half-cuban dive to the deck (such that, if everything goes as planned) you live and airplane flies again, from a similar vertical maneuver that is transformed to a positive G lateral pitch-out recovery that doesn't have you "pulling for your life" to complete the manuever. An example of the latter would be a high-G pitch-out with a roll in excess of 90 degrees which has you recovering at something less than a 90 degree down-line normal to the plane of the earth.... I've seen more than one high-time airshow warbird performer limit his act to such maneuvers, and the thought that occurs to me is if the picture/sight out the windscreen isn't what is expected, he now has the option of (slightly) leveling the wings and pulling out of the manuever instead of "pulling for his life" and hoping there is enough airspace betwixt him and terra firma to stay out of the news / newspapers.... Hmmphh. Reminds me of a thread from a while back where Peter D jumped ugly all over me for expressing my opinion that irreplacable warbirds shouldn't be risked in air races. I thought (and still do) that it'd be just as exciting for the crowd to see Mustangs, Corsairs, etc doing simple aero stuff like low passes/steep turns that wouldn't put the plane at risk unlike the low altitude, high-G yank & bank that happens in air races. Because I couldn't cite air race/airshow safety statistics ad nauseum, my position was indefensible (sayeth he) I think the guys that have the priviledge to own those planes have a responsibility to preserve them as they are irreplaceable pieces of history, but then again it's a free country... Harrummph. There is more that one Peter D. I, for one, find myself of both sides on many of these issues; and the more I learn, the less I'm sure... Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Close encounter with a Blackhawk today | Michelle P | Piloting | 8 | May 20th 05 02:08 AM |
Reamed out by Approach | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 26 | March 29th 05 12:32 AM |
Comming close | Tony | Owning | 17 | May 18th 04 06:22 AM |
Veteran fighter pilots try to help close training gap | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 2nd 03 10:09 PM |