![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc writes:
Thanks. I was partial to the Airnav site, since it also gave info on FBO's, rental cars, nearby restaurants, etc., as well as the charts. Wasn't too happy with AOPA, since it took too much navigating to get the charts. Airnav was pretty easy. Will go to NACO now for the latest. I suspect the AirNav stuff is identical to the "real" charts, and the disclaimer is mainly a legal requirement. The same holds true for other sites such as SkyVector. That way, if you use information from these sites, and if by unfortunate chance it happens to contain any kind of error, and you kill yourself in a plane as a result, it's your fault, not the fault of the sites in question. But in practice, it's the same information in the same format. There are times when I think the obsession with using only "authorized" and "certified" charts is a bit pathological. I can understand avoiding outdated charts, but when you can get a scan of a current chart online, where's the risk in using it? Are details on the charge going to be mystically mutated by the simple act of scanning them? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43? | Ron A. | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | March 15th 06 02:30 PM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |