![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, the Std. Cirrus wing was much harder to configure, but we
learned more in the process. Contrary to intuition, we think modern airfoils will show no less improvement. Consider that the game is reducing skin friction. Laminar flow should not be considered nature's limit. Jim Hendrix On Jan 1, 3:45 am, Bruce Greef wrote: wrote: OxAero wrote: After three years of working to configure Sumon Sinha's deturbulator tapes for my Standard Cirrus, we finally brought it to Caddo Mills for one of those Johnson flight test evaluations. He and Jeff Baird flew it six times with those shiny silver strips on the wings, then three times without. What did they learn? Come to the Convention in Memphis to find out. Dick, as usual, will tell it straight. Will you laugh? Will you be dumbfounded? Will you believe? Jim Hendrix It is nice, but will it work on something other than an antique glider? Is it better than just putting on zig-zag tape? The tests are interesting, but mean nothing without direct comparisons to standard treatments and on a modern airfoil.You know that sounds good - Now I can say: In September I did my Gold distance and Diamond goal(316Km and 322Km) in an antique glider. Somehow sounds quite an achievement. For what it is worth the lift was strong, and even 1:36 was more than enough. Now for that 500km - suspect I will have to be a little more courageous for that one. The point is well taken that the Cirrus has a rather thick "first generation glass" profile. It does produce both top and bottom separation bubbles, and these tend to move, making the exercise of removing them more difficult. This is why you will seldom see a std Cirrus with deturbulator tape - it does not appear to work very well except at specific speeds. I agree it may be harder to show large improvements on better behaved airfoils, but I suspect the old Wortman is a good place to find out if it works in difficult conditions. I presume Dr Sinha had a reason for choosing it beyond availability.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |