A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sinha Deturbulators: Flight Test Evaluation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 1st 07, 05:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
OxAero
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Sinha Deturbulators: Flight Test Evaluation

Actually, the Std. Cirrus wing was much harder to configure, but we
learned more in the process. Contrary to intuition, we think modern
airfoils will show no less improvement. Consider that the game is
reducing skin friction. Laminar flow should not be considered nature's
limit.
Jim Hendrix

On Jan 1, 3:45 am, Bruce Greef wrote:
wrote:
OxAero wrote:


After three years of working to configure Sumon Sinha's deturbulator
tapes for my Standard Cirrus, we finally brought it to Caddo Mills for
one of those Johnson flight test evaluations. He and Jeff Baird flew
it six times with those shiny silver strips on the wings, then three
times without. What did they learn? Come to the Convention in Memphis
to find out. Dick, as usual, will tell it straight. Will you laugh?
Will you be dumbfounded? Will you believe?


Jim Hendrix


It is nice, but will it work on something other than an antique glider?
Is it better than just putting on zig-zag tape? The tests are
interesting, but mean nothing without direct comparisons to standard
treatments and on a modern airfoil.You know that sounds good - Now I can say:


In September I did my Gold distance and Diamond goal(316Km and 322Km) in an
antique glider.

Somehow sounds quite an achievement.

For what it is worth the lift was strong, and even 1:36 was more than enough.
Now for that 500km - suspect I will have to be a little more courageous for that
one.

The point is well taken that the Cirrus has a rather thick "first generation
glass" profile. It does produce both top and bottom separation bubbles, and
these tend to move, making the exercise of removing them more difficult. This is
why you will seldom see a std Cirrus with deturbulator tape - it does not appear
to work very well except at specific speeds. I agree it may be harder to show
large improvements on better behaved airfoils, but I suspect the old Wortman is
a good place to find out if it works in difficult conditions. I presume Dr Sinha
had a reason for choosing it beyond availability.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFI without commercial? Jay Honeck Piloting 75 December 8th 10 04:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.