![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JD" wrote in message ups.com... On Jan 1, 5:39 pm, "JD" wrote: 480 is more capable (has holds, etc), but the 430 is *MUCH* easier to use. If you are a computer geek, go with the 480. If you want easy of flying, go with the 430. If you think you may want to fly G1000 someday, go with the 430 because the nav side is right from a 430. -Robert, CFIII tend to disagree with Robert, I think the 480 has a more intutive user interface. "Ad-hoc" holds: You can define a hold point at any user waypoint or database point. Specify the leg lenght in mins or miles/Kilomiles (grin), direction of turns, etc.. The 480/GPSS will drive the hold for you. And, also, it'll tell you what kind of entry to use, teardrop, direct, etc.. As does the 530. I have a real problem with your statement that the 430/530 is not enroute certified. They are all that is fitted into the bird I fly we fly IFR all the time. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|