![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JD" wrote:
On Jan 1, 5:44 pm, "Roy N5804F" wrote: "JD" wrote in ooglegroups.com... On Jan 1, 5:17 pm, "Roy N5804F" wrote: What do all the aircraft fitted with only dual 430/530's use for primary enroute navigation under instrument rules ? What ever they have been using. Could be VOR for example.I do believe that the updated software for the 480 is required to cure existing problems found with the 480 during /W certification for the 430/530 units ? The VOR portion is an integral part of the 430/530 so I would dispute that the 430/530's are certified for enroute in a normal certified IFR installation. Am I wrong again ? Roy, could just be a time lag in reading/posting, but the 530/430s ARE NOT currently certified for PRIMARY ENROUTE NAVIGATION, IFR or otherwise. I think Roy is correct. The 430/530 *GPS* function is not approved for primary nav, but the built-in VOR receiver could serve as the required additional means of navigation. The issue is not the box failing, it's the loss of RAIM integrity with the older TSO C129a GPS boxes. This limitation goes away with the WAAS approval. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|