A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

zero fuel w & b



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old January 2nd 07, 07:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default zero fuel w & b

"d&tm" wrote in message
...
[...]
Are there any single engine airplanes out there that really can go outside
the envelope by burning fuel?


Sure. Any airplane in which the CG moves as fuel is burned has that
potential, depending on what other aspects of loading exist.

I haven't looked at the 172 case recently. Possibly due to weight
restrictions for baggage or seats you can't load it close enough to the
critical end of the CG range with full fuel for the CG to move outside the
range by using up fuel? I don't know off the top of my head.

What I do know is that I own a single-engine airplane (Lake Renegade) that
can wind up with the CG out of range after fuel has burned. I also know
from my friends who own Bonanzas that at least some models of Bonanza have a
similar issue. I am sure there are a number of smaller single-engine
airplanes that have the same requirement to pay close attention to weight &
balance.

Of course, there's a difference between the potential for problems
generally, and the potential for problems with specific loadings. Generally
speaking, I've found that the issue of CG moving out of range with fuel burn
still only happens in specific loading configurations. For example, in my
airplane the issue is most pronounced when the airplane is heavily loaded to
start with, and when that weight is mostly up front. Even at higher
weights, there are loading configurations that are generally assured to not
wind up outside the CG range as fuel burns.

As long as you've done enough W&B calculations to check the various
configurations and be very familiar with how the CG moves according to
loading and fuel, then to some extent it's not necessary to do a full W&B
calculation for every flight, assuming you've otherwise ensured you're not
overweight and have a loading configuration for which fuel burn isn't an
issue.

But, it's certainly not safe to say that one need not worry about fuel burn
for single-engine airplanes, even if you limit that statement to the smaller
ones (two- and four-seat).

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Running dry? Greg Copeland Piloting 257 August 26th 05 03:47 PM
"Tanks on both" checklist item Koopas Ly Piloting 46 December 12th 03 03:42 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
Hot Starting Fuel Injected Engines Peter Duniho Piloting 23 October 18th 03 02:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.