![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"d&tm" wrote in message
... [...] Are there any single engine airplanes out there that really can go outside the envelope by burning fuel? Sure. Any airplane in which the CG moves as fuel is burned has that potential, depending on what other aspects of loading exist. I haven't looked at the 172 case recently. Possibly due to weight restrictions for baggage or seats you can't load it close enough to the critical end of the CG range with full fuel for the CG to move outside the range by using up fuel? I don't know off the top of my head. What I do know is that I own a single-engine airplane (Lake Renegade) that can wind up with the CG out of range after fuel has burned. I also know from my friends who own Bonanzas that at least some models of Bonanza have a similar issue. I am sure there are a number of smaller single-engine airplanes that have the same requirement to pay close attention to weight & balance. Of course, there's a difference between the potential for problems generally, and the potential for problems with specific loadings. Generally speaking, I've found that the issue of CG moving out of range with fuel burn still only happens in specific loading configurations. For example, in my airplane the issue is most pronounced when the airplane is heavily loaded to start with, and when that weight is mostly up front. Even at higher weights, there are loading configurations that are generally assured to not wind up outside the CG range as fuel burns. As long as you've done enough W&B calculations to check the various configurations and be very familiar with how the CG moves according to loading and fuel, then to some extent it's not necessary to do a full W&B calculation for every flight, assuming you've otherwise ensured you're not overweight and have a loading configuration for which fuel burn isn't an issue. But, it's certainly not safe to say that one need not worry about fuel burn for single-engine airplanes, even if you limit that statement to the smaller ones (two- and four-seat). Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Running dry? | Greg Copeland | Piloting | 257 | August 26th 05 03:47 PM |
"Tanks on both" checklist item | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 46 | December 12th 03 03:42 PM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Hot Starting Fuel Injected Engines | Peter Duniho | Piloting | 23 | October 18th 03 02:50 AM |