![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Look CLOSELY at those charts, and I mean closely. Which charts? I have VFR sectionals and TACs, plus SIDs, STARs, and instrument approach plates, but no IFR charts. I just told you. LOOP4, KEPEC1, ILS 25L at KLAS. Those are also charts. The aircraft is RNAV-capable, but I will grant that I didn't notice that it was RNAV. I just look at the fixes and so on most of the time, knowing that ATC will probably tell me to do something different, anyway. You should look at those, because if you choose the wrong chart, and your equipment can't support the chart you're filing, you'll be given another SID/STAR to use. Yes, it's a BBJ2 or 737-800, and I know ATC a little in the area, as I fly around there a lot. You best look at the LOOP4 chart again, as you have 2 crossing restrictions you must meet. You must cross the SMO R-160 at or below 3000ft. I believe the FMC knew that, although I wasn't watching to see. ATC had already told me to climb and maintain 5000, which I assumed overrode all other instructions. If you lost your FMC, what would you do? You just can't let your instruments do everything for you the moment you rotate. I'd fathom to see what would happen if you were a /A and didn't have an FMC. Now, you're en route, and you're ready for the arrival. You're still at FL290. Staying that high until your FMS starts to descend is really going to increase your descent rate, as well as try its hardest to maintain a slow speed for your descent. Not good. I recall stepping through the legs looking for anything that seemed like a steep descent and possibly tweaking some legs, although I don't remember the details. What I do remember is that I reached the top of my descent and the FMC started down, then ATC called me and asked why I was low. So I reset the MCP to FL290 and went back up. Seconds later, Center told me to cross something at something (I don't remember what now). My guess was that he forgot that I'd be starting my descent and remembered when he saw me descending, so he called me on it and then cleared me down. I doubt it. There's two places where the Center controller could give you the crossing restriction; one at MISEN, the other at CLARR. If he gave you the one at MISEN (which I know he did), it would make the CLARR crossing restriction a lot easier to make. "Cross CLARR at and maintain 13000 and 250kts. Las Vegas altimeter xx.xx". Yes, I recall getting that. "Descend via the KEPEC1 arrival". Unfortunately, they vectored me around, and then told me to follow some traffic going the opposite way (towards the airport, whereas I was still headed east). I messed up so much fiddling with the FMC and autopilot that I couldn't follow the other guy in, so I had to go around. Then it was more vectors, and following someone else in. I gave up on the AP and flew by hand towards the other aircraft, then intercepted the localizer and configured everything for a nice autoland. They had visual approaches in use. Also, it has been said befo 99.9% of all landings are hand flown, not autolanding, unless on a Cat III ILS approach. ILS 25L is not CATIII. OK. I will ask next time. I have yet to do an approach (in the presence of ATC) that followed the plates, though. Somebody always wants me to do something different. It could be because visual approaches may be in use over using an instrument approach. It provides more flexibility with ATC, plus puts separation responsibility back on the pilot. If you were following traffic, and you were coming in too fast and had to go around, that may not be ATC's fault. There would be some things you could have done to slow your speed down. BL. - - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFnFyxyBkZmuMZ8L8RAlRPAJ46F/N4zOsSv1e6XGhgEKxPzl4IIQCfciYC xuJph8+VuIj1wpVcmleP2to= =LYDq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|