![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
I've learned it a lot better than many non-IR pilots. Even if that were true (you're conveniently forgetting the requirement for basic instrument instruction in the PPL, which you have not gone through and which is the very foundation of any "instrument flight"), what's the relevance with regard to your statement that you "have learned instrument flight"? You still haven't. Notice that last little word, "flight". Learning instrument flight involves FLYING. You haven't. Period. I've simulated, which is good enough. It's not good enough by anybody's standards except your own. So it is not good enough by a long shot. The authorities, not you, make the rules regarding what constitutes "instrument flight" (your choice of words, not mine, so you're going to be held by it). Yes, and ironically they aren't always very realistic. Just certified. How would you know? Have you used them? And even if you did, how would you know how realistic they are? And it doesn't matter anyway, since, as I said above, YOU are not the one deciding what is "instrument flight". And no sensible person would say that you can learn instrument flight only on one of those sims. Why not? Because. It's the way certification of instrument rated pilots works. A simple matter of definition. I'm not the one who seems to be emotional about it. It's not a problem for me. I know what I've learned, and it is considerable. Why are you making life so hard for yourself and your fellow humans? Are you really that incapable of normal human-to-human interaction? Of course you have learned a considerable amount about flying. Nobody in their right mind on this group has ever doubted that, not even those that have attacked you. You know way more than the average layman, and in some areas you know more than some pilots. The effort you have put into learning this is admirable. BUT the point is this: You have in no way and nowhere nearly the qualification to say you have "learned instrument flight". There are strict and clear definitions regarding what that statement means and what it requires. You don't fulfil those requirements by a long shot. Many here do. And you DO offend them by claiming you have the requirement without really having it, because they have put a lot of effort and money into getting it - and they are just as proud of their knowledge as you are. So why not show a little respect? You'd be met with respect in turn. And you'd be telling the truth about your qualifications instead of just making them up. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual glide slope, $95...priceless! | Jack Allison | Owning | 20 | October 22nd 06 03:45 AM |
Priceless Tugs | kojak | Owning | 0 | August 9th 05 10:25 PM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 34 | March 7th 04 06:27 AM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 15 | February 28th 04 04:17 PM |
Priceless in Afganistan | breyfogle | Military Aviation | 18 | February 24th 04 05:54 AM |