![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: Mxsmanic ] Posted At: Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:23 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC Subject: Confusion about when it's my navigation, and when it's ATC .... I do have a problem with transitions between automated systems and flying by hand. Sometimes it's hard for me to keep track of what the systems are doing and what I am doing. As a last recort I occasionally disengage the automation entirely and fly by hand (particularly for approaches and landings), but that is not the objective, that's just to get on the ground safely. So you are really using your home computer as a procedure and systems simulator and not a flight training tool. I will agree that learning systems and procedures are part of the flight training process (or any training process that involves automation), but they are not as big a part of the overall training as you seem to believe. I say that because of your devotion to the idea that you really are doing exactly the same thing as a professional pilot actually flying an aircraft along the same routes. There are a lot of freewill decisions that still take place in the cockpit and those decisions can not be simulated. You just can't let your instruments do everything for you the moment you rotate. This is another way of saying that the freewill decision process has to be considered and you have to allocate the variables those decisions introduce. If it were considered safe, reliable, or even desirable to automate the entire process (as a systems simulator provides) then there would be no flight training requirements because there would be no pilots. True flying is involves much less systems integration and systems management than you seem to believe. Sure, flying will always involve some systems management -- hell we can't even fly our Super Cubs or Taylorcraft in controlled airspace anymore without working with the system somewhat. My point to this post is that you seem to have the incorrect idea about systems management and procedure memorization being the most significant part of operating an aircraft -- that's not the way it is for the large majority of people who fly. You can if they work as designed. And real life comes very close to that, although I understand most pilots fly the first part of the departure by hand, and often landings as well. Refer to your earlier posting about rudeness and consider that you have no experience on which to base your comment immediately above, yet you still have taken an authoritative position from your tone and word choice. This is why others have suggested you consider your own "attitude". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|