![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
So it would probably be best to set the MCP to prevent any descent until I'm cleared, then? MCP = max continuous power? Sorry- not familiar with the term as used on an FMS. The important thing is to not set the altitude hold for descent until cleared by ATC. In simulation, too, even though traffic is sometimes too light to justify it (the ATCs need practice as well). In fact, it seems that I almost never follow the arrival procedure as published. Often just as I'm beginning it, ATC gives me other instructions. I suppose it's a bit of a relief as then all I have to do is follow their instructions, rather than try to follow the arrival chart (but if the FMC is doing it, it's easy). A good center controller will have all of the arrivals spaced like pearls before everyone hits the arrival's gate. That way everyone can follow the arrival as charted with ATC isssuing speed changes to maintain spacing. Is there a specific phrasing that means "you can do your own lateral AND vertical navigation"? Or does ATC as a rule never let IFR flights select their own altitudes? The most common is a clearance to cross a fix at an assigned altitude (crossing restriction). Say for example you are cruising at FL290 and the controller isues you a clearance to cross a fix at 12000'. It is your perogative as to when to start your descent so long as you cross the fix at the assigned altitude. During the climb, ATC sees the final altitude we requested on our flight plan. They try to get us up there, traffic permitting. After that we request from ATC any altitude changes we want and they work us to that altitude, traffic permitting. What does ATC say if they want you to follow everything on the plate, including the indicated altitudes? "DESCEND via the Korry 3" Did your colleague get into significant trouble? No, because seperation wasn't lost. OK, so should I say something like "leaving FL290 for 12000 at CLARR," assuming I'm already cleared to descend at my discretion? Sounds professional. So there is no equivalent of "resume own navigation" for altitude, like "resume own altitude," or whatever? In the IFR world, altitude is all important. There are crossing restrictions and block altitudes, but most of the time we follow If ATC regularly overrides the plates and (apparently) doesn't often clear anyone to follow the altitude indications on the plates, why do all the approach plates seem to mention altitudes? Just for radio loss? In the real world we usually follow the arrival procedures with the altitudes as published. When flying the big jets, just remember that you will need 3 miles for every 1000' you want to descend plus another 5 miles to slow for the 250 knot speed restriction at 10000'. D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|