![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 5, 4:58 am, Mxsmanic wrote: Tony writes: There is a flight path, taking into account roll, pitch, yah, and thrust, that will result in a complete roll with an g meter indicating 1 G into the seat. No, there is not. You cannot change altitude without a change in G. Indeed, any acceleration of the aircraft, in any direction, will change the G force. You can keep it normal to the pilot's seat in many cases, but you cannot hold its magnitude constant. In fact you are wrong. You may wish to look in the archives of this newsgroup for the proof. You can demostrate at least the early part of such a roll by starting a coordinated turn and adding sufficient forward pressure on the yoke to remove the additional G's a level turn would induce. One suce flight path requires you to accelerate downward at 1 G. This is actually a fairly simple classical physics problem -- at least one poster solved it using a spread sheet. You are quite correct, however, in stating most airplanes can be flown in a loop or a roll safely with positive G forces, but nealy all general aviation aircraft certified in the United States are not certified for such flight paths. I do think you didn't quite say what you meant when you stated you cannot change altitude without changing G. What g force would you expect it you were climbing at 500 feet a minute? My real life airplane, an M20, may not be flown at more than 30 degrees pitch or 60 degrees bank, but those kinds of limitations do not apply to someone who games on a flight simulator, or who has a suitably certified airplane.In theory, any aircraft can do a barrel roll, as long as the net acceleration vector is kept downward. My OP request was to have someone who is skilled in simulated flight see if their simulated airplane had the control authority to fly that flight path.I was able to do it in the default Cessna on MSFS, not very neatly but with the G force always positive. It's supposedly an extremely safe maneuver as long as that number stays positive. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |