![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T o d d P a t t i s t writes:
I do wish people would stop discussing the roll. A pure rolling motion cannot affect the force vector in any way relevant to producing 1 G into the seat. It's certainly true that rolling alone does not change the magnitude of the acceleration vector at axis around which the roll occurs. Mx is right, but I think he misses the point - there's nothing that says we can't start in a steady climb or end in a steady descent. Both have a steady 1G load on the aircraft. Even if you start in a steady climb or descent, you cannot avoid a change in G forces in any maneuver that requires a change in the rate of change of altitude, which includes a typical barrel roll that preserves positive G on the pilot. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |