![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Tony writes: Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis yourself. Acceleration is a change in velocity. Climbing from the ground (or from any constant altitude) is a change in vertical velocity (since the initial rate of climb is zero). Therefore climbing involves acceleration. G forces are nothing more than acceleration. Therefore climbing changes G forces. QED. You are correct, but for typical climbing and decending the amount of G away from 1 is so small that as a pilot it is still "1". Entering a climb or a decent moves a G meter such a small amount, you can't see the needle move and you can't feel the small difference in the seat of your pants. There are small G changes in a barrel roll, but not enough to really feel. As a pilot, the manuever is called "1 G". Keep in mind this is in comparison with other aerobatic manuevers that go to routinely 3 to 10 Gs. Danny Deger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |