![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Sam Spade wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto wrote: Not often. For the most, visual approaches are used over ILS approaches. When cleared for the visual approach, you won't be using autoland, as you won't be on an ILS approach, regardless of if you join the localizer and track it. You're still on the visual approach. That just isn't so. Jet aircraft are required to remain on, or above, the ILS G/S whether on an ILS approach or on a visual approach. At the company I worked for, failure to tune and identify the ILS for a visual approach to an ILS runway was a check-ride bust. This would be a company policy, no? Because it could still be done in any other aircraft outside your company. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFnukEyBkZmuMZ8L8RAv1XAKCfj+FajnHlCSUmibkiUn qoSwwTWACdG9B7 hbOiFPvSRrU9vjUr8YKRGHE= =bsZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|