![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony,
Ah, "oversquare" is obvious BS, we can agree on that (said the man coming from the land of SI units, where the whole idea of oversquare goes away when you use Pascal to measure MP ;-)). I cannot think of a cirumstance when following the commonly taught and used procedure of first reducing throttle then rpm, or first advancing rpm then throttle, is not the prudent technique. Again, I mentioned two examples, one common, one maybe not so: 1. Take-off. Leave throttle at full and reduce RPM to 2500 is better for the hardware in most cases than reducing to 25/2500. 2. Dogma. If you're reducing RPM by, say, 200 but leaving the MP at the set value, it makes no sense to reduce MP, then reduce RPM, then increase MP again. Yet some CFIs will insist you do it that way. Here's a third: People flying the "full LOP regime" will often leave the throttle at full for the whole flight, controlling engine power with RPM and mixture alone. If you really know what you're doing, that's perfectly safe and good on the equipment. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does a prop ice up so apparently readily? | Mike Rapoport | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | November 8th 05 02:52 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |