A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I Wish Our Website Was As Good As This



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old January 17th 07, 08:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Sandy Stevenson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Student/Instructor scheduling was: I Wish Our Website Was As Good As This

So, Dan, any chance we could get a look at your website for scheduling?
Sounds intriguing.
Concerning our current plans, we may refine it some more, but as I
currently understand it, our plan is to book only one of our two
seaters with an instructor and students this tightly. The other two
seater and both single seats will be able to be booked, but are
available for ad hoc flights if they are not booked.
The primary users of the other two seater are intro rides, solo
students, and licenced pilots wanting to take family or friends up.
The points made about weather scrambling schedules are right, so we
plan to rotate each group through the 8 available slots each weekend to
give each student a fair chance at some soaring flights, and equal
exposure to the risk of weather delays.
Part of the flexibility of the system we're trying to achieve, and I
doubt it's going to be a perfect system, just better than what we have
had, is that nothing prevents a second instructor from using the second
two seater for additional instruction if it's not otherwise booked.
Given that our field has facilities for campers, and many people do
overnight at the field, if the lift is poor many of our cross country
pilots are also instructors, so there are days when the additional
instruction opportunities do come about.
Hopefully we'll make our ab initio students feel that their time and
contribution is valued and we'll improve our retention rates.


Dan G wrote:
I've spoken to many club members who didn't come back for a second year
of gliding. The main reason given was, indeed, the intrusion of "real
life". However drilling down it was more that they could not afford to
invest a whole day on the airfield, *especially* given that they only
got two or three flights out of it. (BTW, no-one told me they'd left
because it seemed too hard or there was too much to learn, although I
understand that could potentially be a factor.)

These scheduling/booking systems mentioned only amount to making sure
that there's x number of instructors on the field for a period of a few
hours, with y number of students to fly with. We're not talking slots
of 9.15, 9.30 etc.

I spent a weekend at Cambridge last summer and talked to, well,
everyone about their system. As Martin says they have less people on
the field, but no-one deemed it a problem, more something that just
needed to gotten used to.

This one simple system could have a dramatic effect on membership
progression and retention. The problem is getting it introduced. Anyone
in the UK who watched "Can Gerry Robinson Fix the NHS?" knows exactly
what I mean when I say that anyone I talk to tells me "but it's not the
way we do things". I understand Cambridge had this problem, and
conviced the large majority people before railroading the remaing
stubborn few :-).

Let me give an example. Last summer I organised flying on Friday
evenings. Via e-mail I'd arrange winch drivers and instructors. Then
I'd let three students come per each instructor, and everyone got to
fly three times in just three hours (instead of the usual six+).

Then I wrote a webpage (Zoho Creator) which basically did all this for
me. Every time an instructor signed up, the system allowed three more
students to book. It even has RSS feeds so students can be alerted as
soon as more slots are available.

Could I get this introduced? Could I heck! People couldn't grasp that
it wasn't any different from what I'd been doing manually. Luckily a
more forward-thinking instructor has "seen the light" and we're working
on getting it running this summer. My dream is that eventually the
whole club will use the system for all days...


Dan


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
That Didn't Look Good (long) Mary Daniel or David Grah Soaring 1 September 23rd 06 04:09 AM
Website Mltry.- Your Information, Customized for You, Family Communication, Chat, Please Help by Visiting and Signing Gues Wolf Naval Aviation 0 January 8th 05 06:16 AM
Good plans-built Light Sport Aircraft Rob Schneider Home Built 15 August 19th 04 05:50 PM
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? Flightdeck Home Built 10 September 9th 03 07:20 PM
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 8th 03 09:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.