![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, Dan, any chance we could get a look at your website for scheduling?
Sounds intriguing. Concerning our current plans, we may refine it some more, but as I currently understand it, our plan is to book only one of our two seaters with an instructor and students this tightly. The other two seater and both single seats will be able to be booked, but are available for ad hoc flights if they are not booked. The primary users of the other two seater are intro rides, solo students, and licenced pilots wanting to take family or friends up. The points made about weather scrambling schedules are right, so we plan to rotate each group through the 8 available slots each weekend to give each student a fair chance at some soaring flights, and equal exposure to the risk of weather delays. Part of the flexibility of the system we're trying to achieve, and I doubt it's going to be a perfect system, just better than what we have had, is that nothing prevents a second instructor from using the second two seater for additional instruction if it's not otherwise booked. Given that our field has facilities for campers, and many people do overnight at the field, if the lift is poor many of our cross country pilots are also instructors, so there are days when the additional instruction opportunities do come about. Hopefully we'll make our ab initio students feel that their time and contribution is valued and we'll improve our retention rates. Dan G wrote: I've spoken to many club members who didn't come back for a second year of gliding. The main reason given was, indeed, the intrusion of "real life". However drilling down it was more that they could not afford to invest a whole day on the airfield, *especially* given that they only got two or three flights out of it. (BTW, no-one told me they'd left because it seemed too hard or there was too much to learn, although I understand that could potentially be a factor.) These scheduling/booking systems mentioned only amount to making sure that there's x number of instructors on the field for a period of a few hours, with y number of students to fly with. We're not talking slots of 9.15, 9.30 etc. I spent a weekend at Cambridge last summer and talked to, well, everyone about their system. As Martin says they have less people on the field, but no-one deemed it a problem, more something that just needed to gotten used to. This one simple system could have a dramatic effect on membership progression and retention. The problem is getting it introduced. Anyone in the UK who watched "Can Gerry Robinson Fix the NHS?" knows exactly what I mean when I say that anyone I talk to tells me "but it's not the way we do things". I understand Cambridge had this problem, and conviced the large majority people before railroading the remaing stubborn few :-). Let me give an example. Last summer I organised flying on Friday evenings. Via e-mail I'd arrange winch drivers and instructors. Then I'd let three students come per each instructor, and everyone got to fly three times in just three hours (instead of the usual six+). Then I wrote a webpage (Zoho Creator) which basically did all this for me. Every time an instructor signed up, the system allowed three more students to book. It even has RSS feeds so students can be alerted as soon as more slots are available. Could I get this introduced? Could I heck! People couldn't grasp that it wasn't any different from what I'd been doing manually. Luckily a more forward-thinking instructor has "seen the light" and we're working on getting it running this summer. My dream is that eventually the whole club will use the system for all days... Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
That Didn't Look Good (long) | Mary Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 1 | September 23rd 06 04:09 AM |
Website Mltry.- Your Information, Customized for You, Family Communication, Chat, Please Help by Visiting and Signing Gues | Wolf | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 8th 05 06:16 AM |
Good plans-built Light Sport Aircraft | Rob Schneider | Home Built | 15 | August 19th 04 05:50 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |