![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Larry Dighera posted:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:55:15 -0800, C J Campbell wrote in m: Definitely one of the most inane laws ever passed. But the purpose of this law is not to fight terrorism. It is to embarrass Democrats. The outgoing party knew full well that this law would probably be repealed, so now they can say during the next election that the Democrats repealed an 'anti-terrorism' measure, without saying exactly what that measure was. Perhaps. But why isn't the law designed to cause aircraft owners to perjure themselves by failing to declare there affiliation with listed terrorist organizations, so that they can be prosecuted? I doubt that the Constitution would permit prosecuting people for merely being members of the listed terrorist organizations alone. You are talking about a State that just recently deported an Imam who, on his application for citizenship didn't declare his affiliations with a group that *wasn't* on a terrorist watch list at the time. As if that wasn't bad enough, instead of winding up in the Palestinian territories to where he was deported, he is being detained by Isreal, where he was delivered. So, yes, Ohio prosecutes people for far less than merely being members of listed terrorist organizations. On a lesser note, this State also increased the licensing tax on GA planes to the same amount as commercial aircraft. They do these things to pilots because there aren't enough of us to create a political problem for them. I agree with C J on the motivations behind this law, and the only practical benefit to its existance. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|