A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Safety pilot "flight time"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old January 23rd 07, 02:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
kevmor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default Safety pilot "flight time"

Thanks Mark, I think after reading pages and pages of this topic it's
starting to get clearer (especially the SIC/PIC difference). I can log
the time I put in the PIC or SIC column in the flight duration column,
right? So this could count towards the 250 hr. Commercial rating
requirement?

On Jan 22, 5:18 pm, Mark Hansen wrote:
On 01/22/07 17:02, kevmor wrote:

My question was actually what to put in the "flight duration" or "total
flight time" field of your logbook, if anything. For example, I have a
friend who wants to start his instrument rating. I want to fly with
him between his CFI lessons to let him practice and give tips. If I
can log "flight time" along with the "PIC" (when he's under the hood)
to get time towards a higher rating, that would be great. Should the
"flight time" be equal to the PIC (him under the hood)?If you agree before the flight that you will be PIC while he is under

the hood, then you can log it as PIC for the time that he is under
the hood. If he remains PIC for the flight, then you can log as SIC
the time that he is under the hood.



I think the FAA or AOPA should come out with a quick reference card for
this sort of thing! Well, that's probably true of a lot of areas. Also, there's a lot of

differing opinions here. The FAA does, from time to time, write legal
opinions on subjects where the FARs are not very clear. Bob Moore
was kind enough to post the results of one which is appropriate to
this discussion.



Bob Moore wrote:
Jim Macklin wrote
Yes, please post the entire letter.


How many times do we have to argue this issue?
Every year?--

Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? Tim Epstein Piloting 7 August 4th 05 05:20 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.