![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:07:41 -0800, Sam Spade wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: 4-4-7 does not appear to prohibit (for the pilot) operations at 91.177 compliant altitudes. If ATC does not issue me an altitude restriction, then 91.177 would apply. I would agree. But, few pilots can figure that one out. Then, if I am with a Center that is trained to take exception with altitudes below the MEA or MIA, then they will also take exception with my 91.177 selection, if it is "too low." True, but it is ATC's responsibility to issue me a clearance of "VFR on top at or above nnnn" Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aztec Lower Cowl Mod STC | Jim Burns | Owning | 3 | April 16th 06 03:21 PM |
Cherokee Strut Lower Strut Seal Replacement Report | Mike Spera | Owning | 3 | July 23rd 05 07:07 PM |
Orca Island, WA | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 11 | June 5th 04 04:38 PM |
Flight planning at the lower flight levels | Peter R. | Piloting | 2 | March 16th 04 02:39 AM |
Question about Rear Admiral, lower half | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 28 | October 5th 03 11:24 PM |