![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:09:40 -0800, Sam Spade wrote:
I haven't done it in a long time myself. I did have LA Center a couple times way back when say "Unable to approve VFR on top at the requested altitude.." So, since On Top is an amendment to an IFR clearance I think they can make whatever they choose out of their responsibilities with on On-Top amendment to your IFR clearance. Some controllers or facilities, particularly a mountain-area center, might reasonably be very unconfortable with the IFR flight plan aspect of the aircraft being below MIA or MEA. No doubt. Here in the NE I've only used OTP to get through an overcast. And my usual clearance would be basically out of the 7110.65. Something like: CLIMB TO AND REPORT REACHING VFR-ON-TOP, NO TOPS REPORTS. IF NOT ON TOP AT 7000', MAINTAIN 7000', AND ADVISE. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aztec Lower Cowl Mod STC | Jim Burns | Owning | 3 | April 16th 06 03:21 PM |
Cherokee Strut Lower Strut Seal Replacement Report | Mike Spera | Owning | 3 | July 23rd 05 07:07 PM |
Orca Island, WA | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 11 | June 5th 04 04:38 PM |
Flight planning at the lower flight levels | Peter R. | Piloting | 2 | March 16th 04 02:39 AM |
Question about Rear Admiral, lower half | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 28 | October 5th 03 11:24 PM |