![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kev" wrote For purposes of this speculation, by spoofing the satellite signals. A GPS receiver's RAIM algorithms wouldn't know any difference as long as the signals came with "correct" data. It's not much different than the "evil twin" method of spoofing a Starbuck's WiFi hotspot, and then capturing everyone's keystrokes as they log into their bank account. That is, you simply provide a stronger signal. It isn't that simple because the receiver would still be getting information from the satellite. The combined information would be a mess that would cause the GPS to ignore that portion of the signal. Pulling this off, if it could even be done, would be extremely difficult and expensive - that's what makes it impractical. Beyond that, I seriously doubt that anyone would fly their airplane into the ground as a result. BDS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airspace on Sectional North of Boston | Robert Tenet | Piloting | 13 | April 4th 06 10:49 AM |
FAA Sectional and TAC Maps on my Website | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | January 5th 06 09:08 PM |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 60 | February 8th 05 12:22 AM |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | General Aviation | 12 | February 2nd 05 03:03 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 2 | December 4th 03 01:09 AM |