A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Anything new in to combat motion sickness?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old February 4th 07, 11:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Eiler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Anything new in to combat motion sickness?

As a kid, say thru the age of about 13, I was quite
susceptible to motion sickness. It was guaranteed
that if you put me in the back seat of an airplane
I would get airsick. If I was in the front seat or
in
the back seat with controls and flying I would be fine.
By about 14 I was no longer prone to airsickness
when just riding in the back seat of an aircraft.
But if I attempted to read anything in an aircraft
or a car I would get queasy in short order. It is
not
uncommon for new pilots to get queasy when
navigation requires detailed map reading.
About the age of 35 my eyesight started to
diminish and I began t need reading glasses. A
side benefit of the slightly reduced near vision was
that I found that I could now read while riding in
a
vehicle, without getting motion sickness.


At 09:00 04 February 2007, Alex wrote:
One interesting theory on the cause of motion sickness
is on the
Wikipedia and I am quoting it here, not sure if you
can prove it, but
it's an interesting idea:

'The most common theory for the cause of motion sickness
is that it
evolved as a defence mechanism against neurotoxins.
The area postrema
in the brain is responsible for inducing vomiting when
poisons are
detected, and for resolving conflicts between vision
and balance. When
feeling motion but not seeing it (for example, in a
ship with no
windows), the inner ear transmits to the brain that
it senses motion,
but the eyes tell the brain that everything is still.
The area
postrema will always believe the inner ear signal over
the eyes, as
the eyes are more susceptible to trickery (see optical
illusion). As a
result, the brain will come to the conclusion that
one is
hallucinating and further conclude that the hallucination
is due to
poison ingestion. The brain responds by inducing vomiting,
to clear
the supposed toxin.'







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instructors: is no combat better? ArtKramr Military Aviation 103 March 13th 04 09:07 PM
Did you ever give up on an IR? No Such User Piloting 24 November 26th 03 02:45 PM
Combat Related Special Compensation update for Sept. 8-12 Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 17th 03 03:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.