![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... I'd suggest a REALLY GOOD flight review next time you need one with a REALLY GOOD instructor who knows the relationship between power, altitude, and true airspeed. Or did ..maniac assume a pseudonym? As you can probably see by the length of the thread, this one has gone on for a while. I was talking about trying to explain the phenomenon of how to keep the same IAS you need higher power as you increase altitude, but without actually referring to concepts like IAS and TAS. I wasn't talking about TAS increasing with altitude. I should have made that clearer in the initial post. The whole thing started when a non-pilot friend of mine asked how high planes could fly. I said that it depended on a few things, one of them being the fact that engine power decreases with altitude because of air density. At some point you'll hit an altitude where it can no longer generate the power required for level flight. HOWEVER, even if you have an engine that was turbocharged so well that it didn't lose power with altitude all the way up to space, you'll still probably hit a limit (unless the engine was extremely powerful) because the actual power required goes up with altitude as well. Is there anything unreasonable in what I have just said there? I don't think so. Where I went wrong is in not explaining my question well enough, and people very reasonably thinking that I either meant TAS or how open the throttle has to be. As has been established, I am now certain that my understanding of power, altitude and TAS was and remains correct. I was merely seeking a good layman non-mathematical explanation of it. Hardly a major sin, I think. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. | Big John | Home Built | 6 | July 13th 03 03:29 PM |