A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #32  
Old February 6th 07, 12:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?


"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...
I'd suggest a REALLY GOOD flight review next time you need one with a
REALLY GOOD instructor who knows the relationship between power, altitude,
and true airspeed.

Or did ..maniac assume a pseudonym?


As you can probably see by the length of the thread, this one has gone on
for a while. I was talking about trying to explain the phenomenon of how to
keep the same IAS you need higher power as you increase altitude, but
without actually referring to concepts like IAS and TAS. I wasn't talking
about TAS increasing with altitude. I should have made that clearer in the
initial post. The whole thing started when a non-pilot friend of mine asked
how high planes could fly. I said that it depended on a few things, one of
them being the fact that engine power decreases with altitude because of air
density. At some point you'll hit an altitude where it can no longer
generate the power required for level flight. HOWEVER, even if you have an
engine that was turbocharged so well that it didn't lose power with altitude
all the way up to space, you'll still probably hit a limit (unless the
engine was extremely powerful) because the actual power required goes up
with altitude as well. Is there anything unreasonable in what I have just
said there? I don't think so. Where I went wrong is in not explaining my
question well enough, and people very reasonably thinking that I either
meant TAS or how open the throttle has to be.

As has been established, I am now certain that my understanding of power,
altitude and TAS was and remains correct. I was merely seeking a good layman
non-mathematical explanation of it. Hardly a major sin, I think.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. Big John Home Built 6 July 13th 03 03:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.