![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote
If you do like Campbell and claim there can be no compromise possible I can assue you that all you will do is elimninate small GA. ...and if the other side says there is NO compromise, which many of them do, then what? I've dealt personally with these types, the ones that loved 9/11 because we couldnt fly. The ones that say no improvement to any traffic pattern is enough, only eliminating the airport and the airplanes will do, and glad to see a fatal accident take another airplane/pilot out of the equation - I'm not exagerating. Take a look again at http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm this is the kind of nutcases we're talking about here. The guy who puts this craphole website together hates everything and everybody: pilots, controllers, politicians, aircraft manufacturers, and even some of his anti-aviation counterparts! These are the real problem, a lunatic fringe. Most of the neighbors I've dealt with are not like this, they're pretty hot at first, but not off the deep end like STN and this other clown. Like I said in a previous post, there is no dealing with some people, try as you may. "Paul Sengupta" wrote He said that the movement is making things worse for some people by concentrating the noise... I've seen it here, the politically connected (or they have something the city wants) almosts moves the downwind beyond glide range just to avoid a couple homes, and I do mean a couple - just to put us all over a crowded subdivision. Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|