![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Mullen wrote:
"David Lesher" wrote in message ... "Jack G" writes: A couple of DC-10's were lost due to problems with the thrust bearing - one major crash at Chicago - I don't have a reference handy for the others. I suggest that's because they never happened! Lots of people refused to fly on DC-10's after the Chicago crash - prompting the bumper sticker "If it's not Boeing, I'm not going". The DC-10 was always more sinned against than sinning. In most of its many well-publicised crashes, the aircraft itself was not really to blame, more the way it was flown or maintained. The Paris crash was the only exception to this I can think of off-hand. I've heard that was effectively maintenance too. 747s have had problems with the latching mechanisms on the front cargo door too ( UA811 ). Plenty of Boeings have crashed too. Even (very rarely) an Airbus! John Kinda what I've heard too. The DC-10 had a number of high profile incidents directly after entry into service. Rumour has it that MD fixed all the latent problems so well that it was eventually the safest wide body of its day. Still didn't save its reputation though. Ppl have long memories. PB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|