![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Juan E Jimenez" wrote
Actually, he said that if "successfully sued" means prevailed, then who prevailed against him? (paraphrased; he actually wrote it from the losing respondent's point of view). I haven't seen any evidence that his statement is untrue. The evidence is right there in front of your eyes. When you agree to settle a suit and pay damages, you lose. Not taking sides, but there's generally no admission of wrong-doing when a settlement is reached. Something else to consider in regards to the "big" settlement is that they had liability insurance, therefore the insurance company was named as co-defendant, and they might have driven the decision to settle. The cost of settling could have smaller than the cost of defending a case and appeals that might've dragged on for a couple years. Better a known figure now which you can write off, than an unknown amount (for both defense and outcome) in the future. It also could've been an insignificant sum to the insurance company... remember, insurances companies have insurance too (called re-insurance) to spread their risk. (And re-insurers have insurance, etc, etc... it can even come full circle, which makes calculating responsibility for payouts fun and interesting.) So it could be just as fair to say that the suit was successfully defended. Just because money changed hands doesn't mean bupkis about the merits of the suit. And frankly speaking, I wouldn't trust a "jury of my peers" to decide if it was day or night. These are the same "peers" that bankrupted Dow with a $3.2 billion payout for silicone breast implants which showed no scientific or statistical evidence of causing disease (systemic or otherwise). As a disinterested third party, I also found Chuck to be very forthcoming about his past and current litigation, which is a far cry from catching him in a lie. Did he supply it in his initial post? No, but then it wasn't relevant. Similarly, you'll notice I haven't provided a list of my civil, criminal and traffic violations ![]() Eric "you can't flame me... I said "breast" :-)" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Latest Pipistrel Motorglider Newsletter Uploaded | Michael Coates | Home Built | 1 | September 16th 03 06:04 PM |
so what is the latest word on Sport Pilot ??? | Gilan | Home Built | 12 | September 7th 03 11:14 PM |
Latest Ripon & Fisk (OSH) Updates | Jim Weir | Home Built | 4 | July 20th 03 10:59 PM |
Latest Newsletter | Michael Coates | Home Built | 3 | July 15th 03 10:04 PM |