![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:49:11 +0100, John Halliwell wrote: They evolved that way, from roughly similar airframes as a starting point. Lancasters flying by day would soon develop heavier armour, especially around the engines, less bombload in exchange for more fuel to burn for higher height on the ingress route, and heavier armament like .50 calibres in the rear turret - all of which they were adopting by 1945, which cut into their bombload margin over the B-17. Interesting point, any sources for this. I haven't heard about increasing armour for daylight ops, or trading bomb load for fuel. Look at the trend evident in the Rose turreted B.1/B.IIIs, and the engine installation in the Lanc IV which directly influenced the Lincoln (two-stage Merlins with armoured, annular radiators), let alone the massively increased armament in the Lincoln (e.g. twin 20mm Hispanos in the mid-upper turret). The only way to get more fuel in the Lanc for Tiger Force operations was in the bomb-bay, which had obvious implications for the bombload carried. This just represents a gradual and evolutionary change in operational emphasis. snip The 50s in the rear turrets were IIRC fitted only as a pair instead of the quad 303s. Sure, but this still represented an increase in effectiveness at daylight engagement ranges. And let's remember that each .50 weighed 65 lb., while each .303 weighed 24 lb. As a perfect example of the apples to oranges comparison I'm talking about, the 8 .303s carried by the typical Lanc weigh a total of 192 lb. while the 13 .50s carried by the typical (in late '43) B-17G weigh 845 lb. Oops, there goes 653 lb. of bombs/fuel right there, and then we've got to carry extra fuel to haul that extra weight back from the target. And we're ignoring the extra weight and drag of a ball turret and waist guns plus the gunners and their equipment, which means carrying extra fuel to haul all this extra weight both ways, which the night bombers didn't have). Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1984 "Aces And Aircraft Of World War I" Harcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 16th 04 05:27 AM |
FS: 1996 "Aircraft Of The World: A Complete Guide" Binder Sheet Singles | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 14th 04 07:34 AM |
FS: 1984 "Aces And Aircraft Of World War I" Harcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 26th 04 05:33 AM |
FS: 1984 "Aces And Aircraft Of World War I" Harcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 4th 03 05:40 AM |
FS: 1984 "Aces And Aircraft Of World War I" Harcover Edition Book | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 11th 03 06:24 AM |