![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 10:19 pm, **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY**
wrote: Its just plain good sense not to use cellphones in an aircraft. Has anyone noticed how a NEXTEL phone will tear up speaker phones and computer monitors? Its the pulsing of the time division multiplex (TDMA) RF signal that gets inadvertently coupled into electronics and biases transistors on and off. Think what would happen if a passenger left that phone turned on in a bag near a bulkhead next to some sensitive avionics box and a call came in. Whenever I read about A/C having "uncommanded" control movement, I have to wonder about that environment. wrote: On Jan 25, 8:15 am, "Marco Leon" wrote: Saw a repeat episode of Mythbusters for the first time last night about the use of cell phones on an airplane and interference with cockpit instruments. I know that this was mentioned in a November 2006 thread briefly but the short of it was that they concluded cell phones really CAN interfere with the VOR signals. Sometime in the last year or two, the IEEE (the main EE professional society) had an authoritative article about this in their monthly magazine "IEEE Spectrum." The bottom line as I remember it: 99.999% of cell phones and other electronic gizmos cause absolutely no interference to flight instruments. (The 99.999% figure is indicative, not exact.) But, very rarely a cell phone or other electronic device gets out of spec on RFI (but still "works" so far as the user is concerned) and can make the FI's go haywire. The authors conclude that unrestricted use of cell phones and other electronic devices (including ones now allowed) will probably cause a crash something like once every decade or so. I forget the number, but it's in that ball park -- the kind of thing that, until it happens, the regs seem overly restrictive. But after it happens, everyone will ask "Why didn't they ban those devices?" If memory serves me, the authors cannot rule out that such crashes have already happened. The authors had done a study in which they planted a measuring device in a suitcase and flew it on a large number of flights in an overhead bin, and recorded the EM spectrum. Interestingly, they found cell phones were used illegally about once per flight or thereabouts. They also found a number of cases where a device had failed, at least in the sense that its spectrum could cause interference to GPS and other FI's. They also reported one incident where an airliner's FI's went haywire and the captain asked everyone to shut down all electronic devices. The FI's recovered, and a bit of sleuthing traced the problem to one passenger's device. -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "The RFI-EMI-GUY"© "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." "Follow The Money" ;-P- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not gonna happen. Avionics have to survive HIRF RF at 100V/M over the entire RF spectrum. The real threat is to radio receivers for navigations and communications. A cell phone can swamp out the receiver and block important signals. They cannot cause any permanent damage such as you are describing because of the shielding and other design practices that are put into place to handle HIRF... Dean Wilkinson B.S.E.E. and avionics designer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|