![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Over many years comp finishes in the UK breached the
low flying rules, everyone knew it, some of us said so publicly and were derided for it. Now we have had the accident and from now on the BGA rules will have to be approved by the CAA. If you think that the FAA would act any differently from the CAA then carry on, if you don't, do something about it now before you get something imposed on you that no-one likes. At 16:48 12 February 2007, Kirk.Stant wrote: My point in all of this is; SSA sanctioned rules violate FAR 91.119 and we are in a vulnerable position if we have a UK type accident. No they don't. Like anything else in life, common sense is required. You have to place the finish line so that you either finish along a runway, or away from people and property. Kirk believes the AIM allows him to fly any pattern he wishes. I'd like to listen in as he explains his 50 foot pattern to the Federallies. Let's see now, you started your pattern at 50 feet, pulled up to a tear-drop, down-wind and then landed the other way? When they get through shaking their heads, they'll read him the FAR about Minimum Safe Altitude, then the FAR about Reckless Flying, then they'll lift his ticket and well have one less cowboy ruining this sport for the rest of us. JJ Again, your interpretation vs mine. I've already talked to some FAA guys about it, and they agree with me. I'm sure you can find some other ones who would violate me on the spot - in fact I know one here in IL. Funny though, a circling approach at minimums is OK, though, to these same guys. Guess it depends on what you are trained to do, and who pays you salary. There is a difference between hotdogging in the pattern and flying a thought-out contest finish. And the FARs and AIM provide ample guidance on what you can - and cannot - do in the pattern. I comply with the regulations. You do not want to see it that way, so be it. But it seems to me that I'm not the cowboy in this rodeo trying to ruin this sport! Unfortunately, it's becoming a moot point since the creeping mediocrity of pilot-selected tasks and 500'/1 mile finishes after a 2 hour task seems to be taking over the sport. I guess my definition of a 'contest' is different from some others out there. And a happy monday to you, too! Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? | M | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | May 20th 06 07:41 PM |
How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |
Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) Standards | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | April 6th 04 03:28 AM |