A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Minimum Safe Altitude



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24  
Old February 12th 07, 05:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Minimum Safe Altitude

Over many years comp finishes in the UK breached the
low flying rules, everyone knew it, some of us said
so publicly and were derided for it. Now we have had
the accident and from now on the BGA rules will have
to be approved by the CAA. If you think that the FAA
would act any differently from the CAA then carry on,
if you don't, do something about it now before you
get something imposed on you that no-one likes.

At 16:48 12 February 2007, Kirk.Stant wrote:
My point in all of this is; SSA sanctioned rules violate
FAR 91.119 and we are in a vulnerable position if
we
have a UK type accident.


No they don't. Like anything else in life, common
sense is required.
You have to place the finish line so that you either
finish along a
runway, or away from people and property.

Kirk believes the AIM allows him to fly any pattern
he wishes. I'd like to listen in as he explains his
50 foot pattern to the Federallies. Let's see now,
you started your pattern at 50 feet, pulled up to
a
tear-drop, down-wind and then landed the other way?
When they get through shaking their heads, they'll
read him the FAR about Minimum Safe Altitude, then
the FAR about Reckless Flying, then they'll lift his
ticket and well have one less cowboy ruining this
sport
for the rest of us.
JJ


Again, your interpretation vs mine. I've already talked
to some FAA
guys about it, and they agree with me. I'm sure you
can find some
other ones who would violate me on the spot - in fact
I know one here
in IL. Funny though, a circling approach at minimums
is OK, though,
to these same guys. Guess it depends on what you are
trained to do,
and who pays you salary.

There is a difference between hotdogging in the pattern
and flying a
thought-out contest finish. And the FARs and AIM provide
ample
guidance on what you can - and cannot - do in the pattern.
I comply
with the regulations. You do not want to see it that
way, so be it.
But it seems to me that I'm not the cowboy in this
rodeo trying to
ruin this sport!

Unfortunately, it's becoming a moot point since the
creeping
mediocrity of pilot-selected tasks and 500'/1 mile
finishes after a 2
hour task seems to be taking over the sport. I guess
my definition of
a 'contest' is different from some others out there.

And a happy monday to you, too!

Kirk
66







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? M Instrument Flight Rules 23 May 20th 06 07:41 PM
How safe is it, really? June Piloting 227 December 10th 04 05:01 AM
What's minimum safe O2 level? PaulH Piloting 29 November 9th 04 07:35 PM
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude john smith Piloting 3 July 22nd 04 10:48 AM
Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) Standards O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 23 April 6th 04 03:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.