![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 12:11 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: The first part of every instrument training syllabus I've ever seen emphasizes the ability to control the airplane first and foremost. Does that mean that you can fly VFR without the ability to control the airplane? Are you sure you are not confusing the need to know your situation with the need to control the airplane? The latter is required for any type of flying; the former is a task that is always required but is achieved differently in IFR versus VFR. I think both are important. They are. But controlling the aircraft is something you _always_ do, in _any_ type of flying--IFR is no different from VFR in this respect, as all the same techniques are used. Knowing your situation, on the other hand, requires vastly different techniques in IFR versus VFR, and that's what you have to learn for an instrument rating. In fact if you can't control the airplane, but you know everything else about your situational awareness and what exact procedures to follow, you will die knowing exactly where you are buried. Yes, but that's just as true in VFR. The PIC is always responsible for the safety on his/her ship, and of course that includes monitoring the gauges to make sure the autopilot is doing it's job. But what happens when you notice it isn't behaving properly and you have to pull the breaker? That's why it's important to have a backup plan. I'd start by turning it off rather than pulling a breaker. You need backup plans, but the fear of something failing shouldn't prevent you from using it for normal flights. Different skill sets are required to control the airplane precisely using instrument reference alone, versus looking out the window. No. Different skill sets are required for _situational awareness_ in instrument flight. Controlling the airplane works in exactly the same way in all types of flight. The rudder and yoke still work the same way, even in IMC. The aircraft doesn't know or care whether you are in VMC or IMC. I would not be ashamed to use the autopilot. I'm just talking about training here. I would be ashamed to have earned my instrument rating and have to be dependent on the autopilot to be safe. But I doubt there are any CFII's out there that would let that happen. Nobody says that you have to be dependent on an autopilot. But you can certainly be accustomed to using it. Having an autopilot and not knowing how to use it can be just as bad as depending on an autopilot and having it fail. It's a 5 second (or so) flash(?) animation athttp://www.reality- xp.com/products/FLNT/index.htm. Very impressive. Ah, I'm not able to view Flash, but if it convinces you, so much the better. They are nice gauges. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. I noticed you left out the part of my response where I told you this was for training purposes only. Just curious. In MSFS, have you ever tried to complete a flight in IMC without an autopilot? Or with partial panel? And were you able to stay within 100 ft of your target altitude , and 10 degrees of your assigned heading for the entire flight? Or do you feel this exercise is unimportant and pointless, since nothing ever breaks. How about a simulated power loss followed by an off-field landing. Or even a power loss in the pattern, or after take off. Where can you land? Should these possibilities be considered? The simulator is used by the airlines almost exclusively to teach non- standard procedures. From what I've read, the instructor can break just about anything and everything in the panel, and the pilot is expected to deal with it. How are they able to cope if they don't practice. If my simulator was as sophisticated as the airlines, I wouldn't have to practice non-standard procedures in the real airplane. But alas, my personal fortune does not allow me access to such a simulator. Therefore, the only way I can be proficient is to practice in a real airplane. I agree with you that if you have an autopilot, you should use it. But you should also know how to fly without it, and that takes practice. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MSFS 2004 Video frame rate very slow | Greg Brown | Simulators | 1 | November 11th 05 07:24 PM |
Instrument training | xxx | Instrument Flight Rules | 79 | May 24th 05 11:04 PM |
Instrument training | xxx | Piloting | 82 | May 24th 05 11:04 PM |
"one-week" Instrument Training? | Rod S | Piloting | 7 | August 25th 04 12:03 AM |
Visual bugs in MSFS 2004 | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | October 4th 03 06:34 PM |