![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Engineers can do nothing without clients. Therefore, all structural
failures are the result of the folks that hired the engineers to design the structure, right? No - neither of those are reasonable analogies. They are identical analogies. Your assertion was simply ludicrous. No, they're not. A more fitting analogy, would be to a gun. As we have all heard many times, "guns don't kill people, people kill people." Regardless of whether you're a fan of that statement, I think the logic matches well with lawyers and their clients -- to a degree. To make your engineering analogy work, a better story would be the client who specifically asked an engineer to design the building so cheaply that it would start to fall to pieces shortly after his client had sold it. [ As an aside, most engineers are members of associations like IEEE or ASME that do have ethics codes that would prohibit this. ] Most lawyerly behavior is not really immoral so much as it is amoral. They do their job, which is very clearly defined as serving their clients. It's an issue that has been discussed at length by attorneys over the ages, but in the US system, courts are adversarial: the lawyer's job is zealously represent his client. He has no responsibility to "truth" or "social benefit," etc. (I understand that European courts are more fact-finding and solution-seeking than American. Typically, European judges, for example, take a more proactive stance in managing cases than in the US, where the judge just plays referee.) Now, lawyers, unlike guns are people, so should have some personal sense of right and wrong, but they also have a responsibility to do their jobs well. It puts them in a bit of a gray area. I agree with most here that the lawsuits on aircraft companies for crashes that are not their fault are deeply, deeply, problematic, I don't think the solution is killing the lawyers or making them somehow more "moral." (And of course, there's the little question of who's morality are we talking about?) The problem is the clients, their incentives, and *their* sense of reponsibility and fairness. -- dave j -- not a lawyer, but an engineer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SR22 crash involved racecar driver | Darkwing | Piloting | 24 | November 4th 06 02:04 AM |
insane IMC | Napoleon Dynamite | Piloting | 20 | August 4th 06 05:32 PM |
SR22 crash in Henderson Executive | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | July 27th 05 02:30 AM |
Bill Gates as he presents the Windows Media Player system crash | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | January 11th 05 09:06 PM |
The insane spitfire video clip | gatt | General Aviation | 30 | November 4th 03 06:43 PM |