![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The real problem is the standard of proof and admissibility in civil cases.
In every jurisdiction I know of, in negligence cases an expert can provide an opinion if his opinion is based upon a reasonable degree of certainty *or* probability in his field. That means that if something is more likely than not, defined as 50.00...001% likely, an expert can express an opinion as to causation. Remember that the state must prove a criminal defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and/or to a moral certainty. Some civil causes of action require clear and convincing evidence before a plaintiff prevails. I think there is a little more mass to the Lincoln Memorial on the back of a penny than to Lincoln's head. Thus an expert can express an opinion to a reasonable degree of mathematical certainty or probability that a flipped penny will land on heads. Now anyone who knows anything about flipping pennies knows that's nonsense -- one can't tell how a coin will land on the next flip -- but this guy can swear to it before a jury. Add a little grey hair to a good resume, and a plaintiff can walk away with a lot of money with nothing but fluff for evidence on causation. It's hard to blame the plaintiff. How can you really fault her for making a claim? She is only asking that a jury compensate her for someone else's fault. If she can't prove it, she loses the case. If her lawyer can't prove it, he loses money and time. We need to focus on the reason why so much silly, careless and irresponsible conduct results in big jury awards. I submit that in part, the reason is due to an unreasonably low standard of proof in civil cases. For the legal-minded, yes Daubert helped (albeit on a slightly different point), but doesn't apply to every forum and doesn't go far enough. "Tim" wrote in message ... Denny wrote: I see where the widow of Cory Lidel has filed a suit against Cirrus claiming defective design... Maybe she can sue his parents for having had a stupid child... \We absolutely need a 'loser pays' law in this country... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SR22 crash involved racecar driver | Darkwing | Piloting | 24 | November 4th 06 02:04 AM |
insane IMC | Napoleon Dynamite | Piloting | 20 | August 4th 06 05:32 PM |
SR22 crash in Henderson Executive | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | July 27th 05 02:30 AM |
Bill Gates as he presents the Windows Media Player system crash | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | January 11th 05 09:06 PM |
The insane spitfire video clip | gatt | General Aviation | 30 | November 4th 03 06:43 PM |