![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Ash wrote: My understanding is that the major problem with cell phones on GA craft was simply that the old-style cell networks couldn't handle them. An active cell phone in the air would be within range of a bunch of different towers which caused confusion in the network, since it was built on the assumption that the ground would limit your line of sight so that you would only be in range of two or three towers at a time. There are also interference issues with AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS. At an FAA DER Seminar a couple of years ago, they pointed out that some "phones" would transmit spurrious signals off their frequency that could couple with antenna cables (shielded or not), and interfere with aircraft navigation systems (mainly VOR). It's not as simple as many think (and I'm an aero guy, not an electron guy, so I won't pretend to really understand). I was on a test flight where we determined that our telemetry transmitter COMPLETELY wiped out the reception of our $25,000.00 Ashtech GPS receiver. Older phones (and older aircraft equipment) tend to wander off of their original specifications. While most gliders don't rely on VOR, but rather GPS for navigation (some of us use windows, charts and eyeballs), the interference from "phones" may not be as much an issue -- but we've shown that it can be. The FAA guy indicated that a particular Samsung phone (now off the market, I'm told) could completely trash com and nav functions on an airlner type "ship." Autopilots have been affected, too. "Hardening" transport (airline) aircraft systems (for new models) is a serious consideration in this modern world of emitters, but always needs to be balanced against cost, weight and performance. Also, putting small "pico" cells (a small cell "tower") ONBOARD the aircraft seems to help: the closer tower causes the phone to shift into a lower power consumption mode (i.e., lower transmit power, which translates into less interference). Caution is advised. It would be a shame if your 1000k log was trashed when you called Mom to tell her you finally did it... -Pete #309 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cell phones on GA aircraft | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 18 | October 16th 06 08:12 PM |
GET FREE CELL PHONES and CAMERA PHONES! | ssgg | Home Built | 0 | February 13th 06 02:34 AM |
Fun with Wx on Cell Phones | B4RT | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 9th 05 02:45 PM |
Cell phones in the air | Roger Worden | Soaring | 35 | March 30th 05 11:01 PM |
Cell phones with GPS | Roger Halstead | Piloting | 0 | December 24th 03 03:04 AM |