A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Low towing thought



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old March 7th 07, 01:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Low towing thought

On Mar 6, 4:38 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
"Tuno" wrote in message

oups.com...

This topic is most interesting. I was never taught the low tow, or
presented with the concept at any of the 3 places I took lessons
(Estrella, Seminole Lakes and Turf, 3 years ago). How is it easier for
the glider driver? Wouldn't it create more work for the tug driver?


Are there any enthusiasts of the low tow who are also enthusiasts of
high wing loading for those good days? I've been in the "low tow"
position unintentionally at max wing loading when the tug driver musta
thought he was pulling a 2-33. Seems like there would be no room for
error if one started out in that position, and the tug then slowed
down!


~ted/2NO


I probably flew hundreds of low tows at the old El Mirage Field. Gus
Brigleib insisted on low tow.

If you are flying a low performance glider, the technique for slack is to
just push the nose lower. The glider will just move down and take the slack
out. If, however, you are flying a Nimbus, it will outrun the tug pasing
under it. Pulling up puts in more slack even as the glider slows down
ending in a jerk.

In the end, I suspect the reason Gus insisted on low tow was the TG-3's he
used as trainers. It was very difficult for the instructor, sitting 8 feet
or so behind the student, to see the tug while in high tow. There was a lot
of rollover structure and greenhouse canopy between the front and rear
cockpits. Low tow gives the instructor a great view of the tug. I really
can't think of another reason for low tow.

BTW, low tow seems easier only because there are fewer references, like the
horizon, to help detect being out of position. If you can't tell you are
out of position, it seems OK. In fact, the opposite may be true. In high
tow, the tugs wingtip vortices tend to push a glider back to center
position. In low tow, they tend to pull it out of position.

Bill Daniels


Gotta jump on this one- sorry Bill!
Suggestion of moving down to take up slack is absolutely wrong. This
will increase relative speed of glider and make the situation worse.
The usual reason for slack is glider quickly descending and thus
slightly overtaking tug. Just like what creates slack in high tow.
Proper technique when you get some slack is simply slide out to the
side until slack comes out. Then return to proper vertical position
and move back to center.
Since you are below the wake , vortices are not really and issue.
One of the nice parts about low tow is that you feel the wake on the
vertical tail as height warning instead of fuselage descending into
wake and causing glider to want to start out of position. 2-33 drivers
will recognize this scenario.
BTW- we've tried top stall the tug by pulling the tail down and not
been able to do it.
Cheers UH


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
And you thought AMARC was bad.... Ron Aviation Photos 18 February 2nd 07 05:27 AM
Thought Police Michael Baldwin, Bruce Products 0 November 17th 06 06:58 AM
Just when I thought I'd heard it all:-) Dudley Henriques Piloting 14 November 23rd 05 08:18 PM
A thought on BRS Martin Gregorie Soaring 47 April 29th 04 06:34 AM
I thought some of these are classics goneill Soaring 0 April 8th 04 10:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.