![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Verhulst wrote in
: Tuno wrote: snip Is this a technical fact or just a wishfull speculation? / snip It is a technical fact. Both user equipment (your handheld mobile) and radio base stations (what they talk to) have signal thresholds for "quality of service" that must be met for normal calls (what you're paying for) to go through. These thresholds are MUCH lower for text and emergency calls for obvious reasons: text messages have no real-time requirements (and much lower bandwidth requirements), and emergency calls are, well, emergency calls; who cares about quality of service if it's an emergency. This is quite similar to the ham radio operator voice vs morse code situation. While the signal strengths of both types of signals from a single transmitter will be identical, the *usable* signal strength for code is much less. This is because if a signal is weak or if there is a lot of background noise, it is is much easier to detect dots and dashes than voice. In addition, - all other things being equal, at low SNR AM gives a better quality than FM - morse code can operate with a narrower RF bandwidth, thus reducing noise and increasing SNR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cell phones on GA aircraft | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 18 | October 16th 06 08:12 PM |
GET FREE CELL PHONES and CAMERA PHONES! | ssgg | Home Built | 0 | February 13th 06 02:34 AM |
Fun with Wx on Cell Phones | B4RT | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 9th 05 02:45 PM |
Cell phones in the air | Roger Worden | Soaring | 35 | March 30th 05 11:01 PM |
Cell phones with GPS | Roger Halstead | Piloting | 0 | December 24th 03 03:04 AM |