![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Crash Lander wrote: "Jose" wrote in message ... Surely, any instructor that values his life, would at least do a brief pre-flight himself, regardless of whether the student has already done one or not? Yes. But that doesn't mean that the student needs to be supervised while he does his own preflight. Jose How then, does it 'save time' if the student does the pre-flight before the instructor arrives, if the instructor is going to do it again anyway? Crash Lander Each instructor will have a preferred method for handling student pre-flights based on personal experience. You want the student to develop confidence, and allowing the student to do the pre-flight naturally fits into that side of the learning curve. This however doesn't release the instructor from the responsibility for the pre-flight being done correctly. I've seen instructors use just about every method one can think of for handling pre-flights. In all the years I was instructing, I never had a situation where my student was sent out alone to preflight an airplane that the student was scheduled in with me as the instructor. This doesn't mean I rode herd on the student's pre-flight either. It means that the pre-flight was always treated as part of the dual period. The student always did the pre-flight with me simply watching. A good thorough pre-flight shouldn't take all that long to perform if done correctly. It was always my policy, especially if a Hobbs meter was involved, to schedule each student with enough time the student to do the pre-flight normally as we went out to the airplane together. It's notable also, from an instructor's point of view, that seldom was one of these pre-flights performed where absolutely no comment was necessary between myself and the student involved. Point here is that every moment of a dual session can and should be a learning experience for a student. I always made a point of placing the emphasis on the pre-flight with the student, with comment from me only when appropriate. Using this method proved over time to instill both confidence in the student as his/her pre-flight skills increased to competent levels, and also serve as a silently observed double check on the aircraft's condition by me that satisfied safety requirements. In my opinion, there should never be a situation for an instructor that includes saving time as a factor in a pre-flight. If this is an issue, students are being scheduled too closely together. Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suicides with CFIG on board | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 7 | September 10th 04 11:31 PM |
Private Pilot without Medical -- Sport Pilot operation? | Danny Deger | Piloting | 29 | September 3rd 04 03:56 AM |
Military: Pilot confusion led to F-16 crash that killed one pilot | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 1st 04 12:30 AM |
FA: Cessna Private Pilot and Instrument Pilot Complete Training Kits | Wei-En Tan | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | May 30th 04 07:38 PM |
Beach officials charge Navy pilot with bigamy, By MATTHEW DOLAN , The Virginian-Pilot | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 08:14 PM |