![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:15:14 -0600, "Skidder"
wrote: ... You have two pilots, dual controls, both have full control of the aircraft. To simplify more, let's say they both have current medicals, and have logged at least 100 hours in this specific aircraft in the past. It's just been 95 days since each have flown. What in the regs states that, a pilot with a full set of controls in front of him, must be considered a passenger, just because someone else is flying the plane. It's a fair question, and I can't find a clear answer in the regs. But I'm not a book worm either. I was just hoping there was enough experience *with the regs* somewhere in this group, to locate a definitive answer. It seems to me that FAR 61.57(a)(2) would apply here. "For the purpose of meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) [..that would be the 3 takeoffs & landings..] of this section, a person may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft under day VFR or day IFR, provided no persons or property are carried on board the aircraft, other than those necessary for the conduct of the flight." So doesn't matter whether the other pilot is considered a passenger, he just shouldn't be there if he's not necessary for the flight. - Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Solo | W P Dixon | Piloting | 8 | August 16th 06 05:07 AM |
How do you keep current? | Rachel | Piloting | 18 | January 30th 06 01:24 AM |
L33 Solo | Jeff Runciman | Soaring | 1 | November 14th 05 08:57 AM |
1.4 solo.. | Beav | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 5th 04 12:27 AM |
Solo in a 2-32 | M B | Soaring | 3 | September 30th 03 03:11 AM |